@thesis{thesis,
		author={Rosyalina  Shelly},
		title ={The Analysis Of Conversational Structure In The “Toy Story 3” Animation Movie Script},
		year={2012},
		url={http://eprints.umk.ac.id/1093/},
		abstract={Language is used for communication. Conversations are examples of real communication in real social context. Conversations happen at least two or more than people. There must be turns among speaker’s conversation. The utterance of the first and the second speaker are related. Patterns are attributed to the fact that conversations have identical structure which are created and used by interacting participants who have reasons for participating in the way they do. Those are reasons for believing that conversational patterns can be described in terms of sub goal structure.
The objective of the research is to describe the Conversational Structure of the script of “Toy Story 3” Animation Movie.” The main aim is then elaborated to: (1) to describe the allocation of turn taking in the script of “Toy Story 3” Animation Movie and (2) to describe the adjacency pairs appeared in the dialogue of the script of “Toy Story 3” Animation Movie.
The writer uses qualitative research in form of descriptive method. It means that the method is intended to make a systematic and accurate description concerning the fact and the feature of research data.
The writer found 1144 turns in the script of Toy Story 3. There are 42 characters in this movie. The turn allocation component dominated by the 1 rule. The percentage of turn rules are 59. 20 % of rule 1, 26. 53 % of rule 2, and 14. 26 % of rule 3. The form of repair found 3 times, and 9 times of overlapping. The dominant character who takes the turn are Woody, Buzz, Jessie, Lotso and Mr. Potato Head/ One Eyed Bart. There are 10 pairs of adjacency pairs appeared. There are blame- denial 1 pair, complain- excuse 1 pair, request- grant/ acceptance 1, greeting- greeting 2 pairs, request- challenge 1 pair, request- refusal 2, summons- answer 18 pairs, and question- answer 133 pairs. The new findings of adjacency pairs assessment- agreement 5 pairs, assessment- disagreement 8 pairs are assessment- question 3 pairs, assessment- statement 1 pair, command- undertake 8 pairs, command- challenge 1 pair, command- refusal 3 pairs, command- question 1 pair, command- assessment 3 pairs, command- prohibition 2 pairs, complaint- command 1 pair, complaint- question 1 pair, greeting- suggestion 1 pair, introduction- introduction 1 pair, report- praise 1 pair, statement- statement 1 pair, statement- question 2 pairs, summons- question 1 pair.
Therefore, to be better in analyzing conversational structure, the students should investigate more material of conversational structure; so we will better in understanding language in conversation. The writer suggests that it will be better if we should learn about conversational structure especially the speaker transition and pairs of adjacency to disclose something positive or avoid conveying face-threatening information, because it is important in order to build successful communication.
}
		}