ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN LOW COST CARRIER (LCC)
DAN FULL SERVICE CARRIER (FSC) TERHADAP COST,
REVENUE DAN PROFIT MASKAPAI PENERBANGAN
PADA RUTE JAKARTA - SINGAPURA
(STUDI KASUS: MASKAPAI GARUDA INDONESIA DAN LION AIR)
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI DIRGANTARA ADISUTJIPTO
Author
NUANSYAH, GUSTI
Subject
T Technology (General)
Datestamp
2024-06-21 06:09:32
Abstract :
The aviation industry is developed in two systems, namely the Low Cost Carrier (LCC) and Full Service Carrier (FSC) systems. The development of the aviation industry today leads to a condition whereby the flight operators implementing the LCC system are more than the ones implementing the FSC system. Therefore, the researcher will prove whether the flight with the LCC system gives you increased company revenue, and how much impact the LCC system has on the company's profit. To analyse Low Cost Carrier (LCC) and Full Service Carrier (FSC) flights, it was conducted by comparing the operational costs with the revenue from each airline. From the results of the average calculation of operational cost in the period 1-30 April 2019 it is known that the Low Cost Carrier (Lion Air) with a total cost of Rp 119,160,573 get revenue of Rp 205,623,243 and take a profit of Rp 86,462,670, while the Full Service Carrier (Garuda Indonesia) with a total cost of Rp 138,149,856 get revenue of Rp 293,012,196 and take a profit of Rp 154,862,340. It can be concluded that there is a dominant operational cost on this flight: fuel costs, navigation costs, landing fees and crew fees. The great comparison of the profit to total operating costs is 72.56% for LCC and 112.10% for FSC, which means that the application of the widely used LCC system has not been able to defeat the advantages of FSC system implementation.
The aviation industry is developed in two systems, namely the Low Cost Carrier (LCC) and Full Service Carrier (FSC) systems. The development of the aviation industry today leads to a condition whereby the flight operators implementing the LCC system are more than the ones implementing the FSC system. Therefore, the researcher will prove whether the flight with the LCC system gives you increased company revenue, and how much impact the LCC system has on the company's profit. To analyse Low Cost Carrier (LCC) and Full Service Carrier (FSC) flights, it was conducted by comparing the operational costs with the revenue from each airline. From the results of the average calculation of operational cost in the period 1-30 April 2019 it is known that the Low Cost Carrier (Lion Air) with a total cost of Rp 119,160,573 get revenue of Rp 205,623,243 and take a profit of Rp 86,462,670, while the Full Service Carrier (Garuda Indonesia) with a total cost of Rp 138,149,856 get revenue of Rp 293,012,196 and take a profit of Rp 154,862,340. It can be concluded that there is a dominant operational cost on this flight: fuel costs, navigation costs, landing fees and crew fees. The great comparison of the profit to total operating costs is 72.56% for LCC and 112.10% for FSC, which means that the application of the widely used LCC system has not been able to defeat the advantages of FSC system implementation.
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
