PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PENGGELAPAN YANG
DIDAHULUI HUBUNGAN HUKUM KEPERDATAAN ( Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya No. 1965/Pid.B/ 2020/PN.SBY )
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Author
UTOMO, DITHO KRISWIDYO
Subject
Datestamp
2023-11-23 04:04:59
Abstract :
This study aims to determine the legal responsibility of the perpetrator who has committed an illegal act by pawning a rental car that has been rented. So the action is suspected of causing two different elements of law, namely the alleged embezzlement, on the other hand, there are also achievements that have been denied or are commonly known as default. This study analyzes the decision of the Surabaya District Court No. 1965 / Pid.B / 2020 / PN.SBY. The type of research that the writer uses is normative legal research. The results of this study show that the victim has made a settlement through the criminal realm, but as it should have been, there are two settlement mechanisms that can be taken, first, to settle compensation in the civil domain until there is a permanent decision from the panel of judges, but if the verdict that has been passed by the judge has not been considered satisfied by the victim, the victim can file a weighting through the criminal domain. Second, merge compensation cases in the criminal realm as written in Article 98 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
This study aims to determine the legal responsibility of the perpetrator who has committed an illegal act by pawning a rental car that has been rented. So the action is suspected of causing two different elements of law, namely the alleged embezzlement, on the other hand, there are also achievements that have been denied or are commonly known as default. This study analyzes the decision of the Surabaya District Court No. 1965 / Pid.B / 2020 / PN.SBY. The type of research that the writer uses is normative legal research. The results of this study show that the victim has made a settlement through the criminal realm, but as it should have been, there are two settlement mechanisms that can be taken, first, to settle compensation in the civil domain until there is a permanent decision from the panel of judges, but if the verdict that has been passed by the judge has not been considered satisfied by the victim, the victim can file a weighting through the criminal domain. Second, merge compensation cases in the criminal realm as written in Article 98 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
