PENERAPAN SANKSI TERHADAP PELANGGARAN PERATURAN DAERAH KOTA BANJARMASIN NO. 34 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG IZIN USAHA REKREASI DAN HIBURAN UMUM (Studi Kasus di Kota Banjarmasin)
Total View This Week3
Total View This Week3
Institusion
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Author
INDRA MAHYUDIN, YUFIE
Subject
K Law (General)
Datestamp
2012-05-08 05:32:18
Abstract :
In Banjarmasin, there is many entertainment places (karaoke) established for the purpose of tourism service improvement. However, in its operational, public entertainment place (karaoke) is often breaking the business permission they had. The research problems are 1. How is the form of business permission infraction of public entertainment place (karaoke) that often happened in Banjarmasin? 2. How is the form of sanction application to business permission infraction of public entertainment place (karaoke) in Banjarmasin? and 3. What are the supporting and hindering factors in effort to apply the sanction of business permission infraction of public entertainment place (karaoke) in Banjarmasin? This research used sociological juridical approach method with purposive sampling. 2 of 7 (seven) public entertainment places are taken as sample. Data is direct observation result in research location with respondent/sample derived from karaoke populations in Banjarmasin, namely Athena and Grand Karaoke. And interview result with The Recreation and Public Entertainment Section of Tourism Department of Banjarmasin City as the institution authorities to do monitoring and controlling concerning to public entertainment places. Then the data is analyzed by qualitative descriptive method. From both karaoke places, it can be known that they have conducted infraction to section 11 sub-section 1 point b PERDA Banjarmasin No. 34 year 2004 about General Entertainment and Recreation Business Permission, that is selling alcohol drink. And based on the Banjarmasin Mayor Caution Letter, H.A. Yudhi Wahyuni No. 556/030/Parsenibud/DT/II/07, it is known that they have broken operational hour. Besides, based on the writer observation, the businessman also protecting prostitution transaction process, which is an infraction of section 11 sub-section 1 point b PERDA Banjarmasin City No. 34 year 2004. Over the infraction, they get sanction in the form of Caution Letter. In applying sanctions, there are supporting factors in the form of the relied on sanction upholder HR and also the existence of society awareness to report any infraction. Besides, there are also the hindering factors in the form of the lack of explicity of Banjarmasin PERDA No. 34 year 2004 about General Entertainment and Recreation Business Permission.
In Banjarmasin, there is many entertainment places (karaoke) established for the purpose of tourism service improvement. However, in its operational, public entertainment place (karaoke) is often breaking the business permission they had. The research problems are 1. How is the form of business permission infraction of public entertainment place (karaoke) that often happened in Banjarmasin? 2. How is the form of sanction application to business permission infraction of public entertainment place (karaoke) in Banjarmasin? and 3. What are the supporting and hindering factors in effort to apply the sanction of business permission infraction of public entertainment place (karaoke) in Banjarmasin? This research used sociological juridical approach method with purposive sampling. 2 of 7 (seven) public entertainment places are taken as sample. Data is direct observation result in research location with respondent/sample derived from karaoke populations in Banjarmasin, namely Athena and Grand Karaoke. And interview result with The Recreation and Public Entertainment Section of Tourism Department of Banjarmasin City as the institution authorities to do monitoring and controlling concerning to public entertainment places. Then the data is analyzed by qualitative descriptive method. From both karaoke places, it can be known that they have conducted infraction to section 11 sub-section 1 point b PERDA Banjarmasin No. 34 year 2004 about General Entertainment and Recreation Business Permission, that is selling alcohol drink. And based on the Banjarmasin Mayor Caution Letter, H.A. Yudhi Wahyuni No. 556/030/Parsenibud/DT/II/07, it is known that they have broken operational hour. Besides, based on the writer observation, the businessman also protecting prostitution transaction process, which is an infraction of section 11 sub-section 1 point b PERDA Banjarmasin City No. 34 year 2004. Over the infraction, they get sanction in the form of Caution Letter. In applying sanctions, there are supporting factors in the form of the relied on sanction upholder HR and also the existence of society awareness to report any infraction. Besides, there are also the hindering factors in the form of the lack of explicity of Banjarmasin PERDA No. 34 year 2004 about General Entertainment and Recreation Business Permission.
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
