جسامة الخطأ وأثرها على التعويض: دراسة مقارنة بين القانون المدني الليبي والشريعة الإسلامية
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Author
Shami, Hayat Ammar
Subject
Datestamp
2018-03-12 09:09:40
Abstract :
?????? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ?? ??????? ???????: ??? ??? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?? ??? ??????? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ???????.??? ??????? ??????? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ????? ??????? ?? ??????? ??????? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????. ??? ????? ????? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ???????? ??? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ????? ?? ??????? ????????.??? ????? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ??????? ????? ????????? ???????? ???????? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?? ??????? ?????? ???????? ??????????. ????? ????? ????? ??? ???:???? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?? ??????? ?????? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ????? ??????? ????? ????????? ???????? ???????. ???????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ???????? ??? ???? ??????? ??????????. ?????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ??????? ???????: 1- ?? ??????? ???? ????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ?? ??????? ?? ??????? ????????. 2- ?? ??????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ????? (?? ?? ????? ?????? ?????) ?????? ??????? : 1- ?? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ??? ????? ????? ?? ???? ??????? ?????? ???? ????? ????? ??????? ??????? ????????. 2- ?????? ??? ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ????? ????? ??? ???????? ???? ????? ??????. 3- ????? ????? ????? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ???? ??????? ?????????? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ???????? ?? ?????? ????? ?????. 4- ??? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ????? ???? ??? ???? ?????? ????? ?????????. 5- ??? ?? ????? ???? ??????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ???. ABSTRACT The significance of this research is divided into two aspects: first, theoretically, the law of state of Libya does not consider the mistake on its verdict and no previous studies concerning this are available. The research covers several problems related to aspect of life as well as the daily life of a person. Second, practically, the concept of giving criminal punishment is also regulated within civil law. However, the problems of this research concern with the debate of preventive function along with the court sentence. The statements of problem of this research are: 1. How to measure the law compensation in accordance with objective and personal criteria? 2. How significant the relation between the law compensation and the mistakes as regulated in Libyan civil code and Islamic Law? This research aims to explain the relation of the measurement of law compensation and the mistakes made based on the perspective of Libyan civil code and Islamic Law. It also aims to describe the measurement process of law compensation based on two points of view: objectively and personally. The researcher applies descriptive qualitative approach to present data deductively. The results of this research are: 1. the criteria used by the Libyan civil code and Islamic law in measuring the compensation law is in objective criteria, 2. the Libyan civil code and Islamic Law do not consider how big the mistake is in measuring the compensation law. The recommendations of this research are: the Libyan lawmaker should 1. elaborate the related articles in civil code and avoid bias as related to the associated conditions, 2. review the two criteria simultaneously in order to decide how big the mistake is (verdict) without neglecting both of the criteria, 3. implement the preventive function to avoid the violation of the rule sentenced, and consider respecting other people?s right, 4. have significant role to decide the verdict (mistake). This is possible through the making of prevention that can give a big impact towards the perpetrator, 5. together with judges and Islamic law experts, find a solution for preventive action instead of sentencing the verdict. ABSTRAK Pentingnya penelitian ini terbagi dalam dua segi; segi teori, yaitu : Hukum Negara Libya yang tidak menggambil besar kesalahan, dan tidak ada studi terdahulu yang membahas tentang hal ini. Penelitian ini meliputi beberapa masalah yang berkaitan dengan aspek kehidupan dari keseharian seorang manusia. Adapun dari segi praktek meliputi pengambilan gagasan pemberian hukuman jera dalam hukum pidana dan aturannya yang terdapat dalam hukum perdata. Adapun masalah dari penelitian ini berkaitan dengan perdebatan antara fungsi pencegahan dengan fungsi pemberian hukuman. Rumusan masalah dari penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut: 1. Bagaimana mengukur kompensasi hukum yang sesuai dengan kriteria objektif dan personal?. 2. Seberapa besar hubungan antara ukuran kompensasi hukum dengan besar kesalahan dalam hukum perdata Libya dan hukum Islam? Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui serta menjelaskan seberapa besar hubungan antara ukuran kompensasi hukum dengan besar kesalahan dalam hukum perdata Libya dan hukum Islam. Dan menjelaskan bagaimana proses pengukuran kom
?????? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ?? ??????? ???????: ??? ??? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?? ??? ??????? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ???????.??? ??????? ??????? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ????? ??????? ?? ??????? ??????? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????. ??? ????? ????? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ???????? ??? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ????? ?? ??????? ????????.??? ????? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ??????? ????? ????????? ???????? ???????? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?? ??????? ?????? ???????? ??????????. ????? ????? ????? ??? ???:???? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?? ??????? ?????? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ????? ??????? ????? ????????? ???????? ???????. ???????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ???????? ??? ???? ??????? ??????????. ?????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ??????? ???????: 1- ?? ??????? ???? ????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ?? ??????? ?? ??????? ????????. 2- ?? ??????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ????? (?? ?? ????? ?????? ?????) ?????? ??????? : 1- ?? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ??? ????? ????? ?? ???? ??????? ?????? ???? ????? ????? ??????? ??????? ????????. 2- ?????? ??? ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ????? ????? ??? ???????? ???? ????? ??????. 3- ????? ????? ????? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ???? ??????? ?????????? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ???????? ?? ?????? ????? ?????. 4- ??? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ????? ???? ??? ???? ?????? ????? ?????????. 5- ??? ?? ????? ???? ??????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ???. ABSTRACT The significance of this research is divided into two aspects: first, theoretically, the law of state of Libya does not consider the mistake on its verdict and no previous studies concerning this are available. The research covers several problems related to aspect of life as well as the daily life of a person. Second, practically, the concept of giving criminal punishment is also regulated within civil law. However, the problems of this research concern with the debate of preventive function along with the court sentence. The statements of problem of this research are: 1. How to measure the law compensation in accordance with objective and personal criteria? 2. How significant the relation between the law compensation and the mistakes as regulated in Libyan civil code and Islamic Law? This research aims to explain the relation of the measurement of law compensation and the mistakes made based on the perspective of Libyan civil code and Islamic Law. It also aims to describe the measurement process of law compensation based on two points of view: objectively and personally. The researcher applies descriptive qualitative approach to present data deductively. The results of this research are: 1. the criteria used by the Libyan civil code and Islamic law in measuring the compensation law is in objective criteria, 2. the Libyan civil code and Islamic Law do not consider how big the mistake is in measuring the compensation law. The recommendations of this research are: the Libyan lawmaker should 1. elaborate the related articles in civil code and avoid bias as related to the associated conditions, 2. review the two criteria simultaneously in order to decide how big the mistake is (verdict) without neglecting both of the criteria, 3. implement the preventive function to avoid the violation of the rule sentenced, and consider respecting other people?s right, 4. have significant role to decide the verdict (mistake). This is possible through the making of prevention that can give a big impact towards the perpetrator, 5. together with judges and Islamic law experts, find a solution for preventive action instead of sentencing the verdict. ABSTRAK Pentingnya penelitian ini terbagi dalam dua segi; segi teori, yaitu : Hukum Negara Libya yang tidak menggambil besar kesalahan, dan tidak ada studi terdahulu yang membahas tentang hal ini. Penelitian ini meliputi beberapa masalah yang berkaitan dengan aspek kehidupan dari keseharian seorang manusia. Adapun dari segi praktek meliputi pengambilan gagasan pemberian hukuman jera dalam hukum pidana dan aturannya yang terdapat dalam hukum perdata. Adapun masalah dari penelitian ini berkaitan dengan perdebatan antara fungsi pencegahan dengan fungsi pemberian hukuman. Rumusan masalah dari penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut: 1. Bagaimana mengukur kompensasi hukum yang sesuai dengan kriteria objektif dan personal?. 2. Seberapa besar hubungan antara ukuran kompensasi hukum dengan besar kesalahan dalam hukum perdata Libya dan hukum Islam? Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui serta menjelaskan seberapa besar hubungan antara ukuran kompensasi hukum dengan besar kesalahan dalam hukum perdata Libya dan hukum Islam. Dan menjelaskan bagaimana proses pengukuran kom
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
