Violation Maxims of Politeness Principles in USA Presidential Candidate Debates of 2016
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Author
Albaniah, Zahrah
Subject
Politeness Principle
Datestamp
2018-12-19 02:07:42
Abstract :
The aims of this study are to find out the types of maxim violation whichoccured in the context of politeness principle used by the USA Presidential Candidates Debate, How the violation of maxims were realized and Why the participants violated maxims of politeness principle in USA Presidential Candidates Debate. This research is conducted by using descriptive qualitative design. The data are utterances in the third presidential election debate of 2016 between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. The data are analyzed by using politeness principle proposed byGeoffrey Leech (1983). The results of this study show that (1) the types of maxim violation occured in the context of politeness principles, namely generosity maxim, approbation maxim, modesty maxim and agreement maxim. There are 11 (32%) generosity maxim, 8 (23%) approbation maxim, agreement maxim12 (34%) and modesty maxim4 (11%).It is found in affirmative and negative utterances sentences. It is approved that violate the politeness principle in debate as in speaker and hearer possibly.(2) The finding revealed that maxims of politeness principles in political debates can be violated in a number of ways, categorized as, generosity maxim, approbation maxim, agreement maxims and modesty maxims. By breaking the maxims that generate conversational implicature, this study reveals that the politicians are being uncooperative.
The aims of this study are to find out the types of maxim violation whichoccured in the context of politeness principle used by the USA Presidential Candidates Debate, How the violation of maxims were realized and Why the participants violated maxims of politeness principle in USA Presidential Candidates Debate. This research is conducted by using descriptive qualitative design. The data are utterances in the third presidential election debate of 2016 between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. The data are analyzed by using politeness principle proposed byGeoffrey Leech (1983). The results of this study show that (1) the types of maxim violation occured in the context of politeness principles, namely generosity maxim, approbation maxim, modesty maxim and agreement maxim. There are 11 (32%) generosity maxim, 8 (23%) approbation maxim, agreement maxim12 (34%) and modesty maxim4 (11%).It is found in affirmative and negative utterances sentences. It is approved that violate the politeness principle in debate as in speaker and hearer possibly.(2) The finding revealed that maxims of politeness principles in political debates can be violated in a number of ways, categorized as, generosity maxim, approbation maxim, agreement maxims and modesty maxims. By breaking the maxims that generate conversational implicature, this study reveals that the politicians are being uncooperative.
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
