Kualitas Informasi Artikel Pada E-Jurnal Emerald Di Perpustakaan Universitas Surabaya Sebagai Sumber Informasi Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya
Total View This Week8
Total View This Week8
Institusion
Universitas Airlangga
Author
Anggun Tri Cahyaningtyas
Subject
Z665 Library Science. Information Science
Datestamp
2021-06-16 08:34:34
Abstract :
E-journals are an important source of information to support the needs of the academic community, especially as a reference material for a study. To obtain quality reference materials, information sources must meet the criteria for quality information. This study discusses the description of the quality of information articles in the Emerald e-journal as a source of student information based on the information quality theory of Wang and Strong (1996). Wang and Strong's theory (1996) measure the quality of information based on 4 categories: intrinsical quality, contextual quality, representational quality, accessibility quality. The research method used is descriptive quantitative method. This research was conducted at the Library of the University of Surabaya with a total of 100 respondents using purposive sampling method. The result of the study is that the highest average value is in the intrinsically quality category in the believable dimension with a value of 3.73 include in high category. Meanwhile, the lowest average value is in the representational quality category in the interpretability dimension with a value of 3.43 include in high category.
E-journals are an important source of information to support the needs of the academic community, especially as a reference material for a study. To obtain quality reference materials, information sources must meet the criteria for quality information. This study discusses the description of the quality of information articles in the Emerald e-journal as a source of student information based on the information quality theory of Wang and Strong (1996). Wang and Strong's theory (1996) measure the quality of information based on 4 categories: intrinsical quality, contextual quality, representational quality, accessibility quality. The research method used is descriptive quantitative method. This research was conducted at the Library of the University of Surabaya with a total of 100 respondents using purposive sampling method. The result of the study is that the highest average value is in the intrinsically quality category in the believable dimension with a value of 3.73 include in high category. Meanwhile, the lowest average value is in the representational quality category in the interpretability dimension with a value of 3.43 include in high category.
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
