ANALISIS DURASI DAN BIAYA PEMBANGUNAN GEDUNG MENGGUNAKAN METODE FAST-TRACK (STUDI KASUS : GEDUNG LOKA KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT PALEMBANG)
Total View This Week0
Total View This Week0
Institusion
Universitas Sriwijaya
Author
NOVELIA JONANDA (STUDENT ID : 03011381720001)
Betty Susanti (LECTURER ID : 0004018001)
Mona Foralisa Toyfur (LECTURER ID : 0007047401)
Betty Susanti (LECTURER ID : 0004018001)
Mona Foralisa Toyfur (LECTURER ID : 0007047401)
Subject
TA190-194 Management of engineering works
Datestamp
2019-10-04 06:55:05
Abstract :
Project scheduling in Indonesia generally still uses conventional method (S-Curve and Bar-Chart). However, there are few weakness of using conventional method. It cannot predict a job that should be prioritized and time deviation that doesn?t show impact on total time, therefore it?s a common case can be difference between planning and implementation. The purpose of this research is to give an alternative to contractors to minimalize delay by accelerating project duration using Fast-Track method. Fast-Track method used towards a job in critical line by substituting tied a job with overlapping job and rearrange dependence connection between it. The construction of Palembang Public Health Workshop Building is chosen as a case study because still uses conventional schedulling method. Secondary supporting data that used is Cost Estimination (CE/RAB), S-Curve and Bar-Chart. In the research, Fast-Track method uses 2 assumption maximum acceleration of 40% and 50% from previous duration. The determination of critical line job is obtained using PDM method with Microsoft Project 2016. This research function to analyze acceleration in critical line, and compare the duration and cost influence between Non Fast-Track and Fast-Track S-Curve. Analysis result of accelerated duration on maximum acceleration of 40%, can reduce 10% of the duration or 18 days. While maximum acceleration of 50%, duration is reduced by 13,88% or 25 days. Accelerating the duration affects cost-saving especially on indirect cost. Accelerated duration of 40%, the saved cost are 0,023% or around Rp3,040,615.26. While on accelerated duration of 50%, savings on 0,033% from original cost or Rp4,223,076.75.
Project scheduling in Indonesia generally still uses conventional method (S-Curve and Bar-Chart). However, there are few weakness of using conventional method. It cannot predict a job that should be prioritized and time deviation that doesn?t show impact on total time, therefore it?s a common case can be difference between planning and implementation. The purpose of this research is to give an alternative to contractors to minimalize delay by accelerating project duration using Fast-Track method. Fast-Track method used towards a job in critical line by substituting tied a job with overlapping job and rearrange dependence connection between it. The construction of Palembang Public Health Workshop Building is chosen as a case study because still uses conventional schedulling method. Secondary supporting data that used is Cost Estimination (CE/RAB), S-Curve and Bar-Chart. In the research, Fast-Track method uses 2 assumption maximum acceleration of 40% and 50% from previous duration. The determination of critical line job is obtained using PDM method with Microsoft Project 2016. This research function to analyze acceleration in critical line, and compare the duration and cost influence between Non Fast-Track and Fast-Track S-Curve. Analysis result of accelerated duration on maximum acceleration of 40%, can reduce 10% of the duration or 18 days. While maximum acceleration of 50%, duration is reduced by 13,88% or 25 days. Accelerating the duration affects cost-saving especially on indirect cost. Accelerated duration of 40%, the saved cost are 0,023% or around Rp3,040,615.26. While on accelerated duration of 50%, savings on 0,033% from original cost or Rp4,223,076.75.
File :
RAMA_22201_03011381720001.pdf
RAMA_22201_03011381720001_TURNITIN.pdf
RAMA_22201_03011381720001_0004018001_0007047401_01_front_ref.pdf
RAMA_22201_03011381720001_0004018001_0007047401_02.pdf
RAMA_22201_03011381720001_0004018001_0007047401_03.pdf
RAMA_22201_03011381720001_0004018001_0007047401_04.pdf
RAMA_22201_03011381720001_0004018001_0007047401_05.pdf
RAMA_22201_03011381720001_0004018001_0007047401_06_ref.pdf
RAMA_22201_03011381720001_0004018001_0007047401_07_lamp.pdf
Download
book
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
cloud_download
Original Resource
url resource Institution
