Abstract :
The purpose of this study was to (1) describe the form of inconsistency or
inconsistency in cohesion, (2) describe the form of inconsistency or inconsistency in
coherence in the editorial discourse of the daily Lombok Post April 2016 edition. This
research is a qualitative descriptive study. This research using the editorial of the
daily Lombok Post April 2016 edition. Data collection techniques in this study used
reading, noting, grouping techniques , studying each word . Data analysis techniques
in this study make use of n qualitative techniques. The results of this study indicate
that the total number b) the discrepancy in the use of cohesion tools in the Lombok
Post edition of the April 2016 daily editorial discourse found 5 discrepancies, namely
4 kinds of conjunction discrepancies, 1 kind of repetition, 1 kind of substitution, only
1 kind of collocation, and 1 kind of non-conformity. . In the discrepancy of the use of
this cohesion tool, the most prevalent in conjunction disagreements , and the form of
non- conformity with the use of coherence tools is 4 discrepancies , namely
incompatibility togetherness , parallelism , comparison , and details each only have 1
discrepancy.
Keywords: inconsistency, cohesiveness, coherence, discourse.